Syndecan-4 proteoliposomes enhance revascularization in a rabbit hind limb ischemia model of peripheral ischemia.

Regenerative therapeutics for treating peripheral arterial disease are an appealing strategy for creating more durable solutions for limb ischemia. In this work, we performed preclinical testing of an injectable formulation of syndecan-4 proteoliposomes combined with growth factors as treatment for peripheral ischemia delivered in an alginate hydrogel. We tested this therapy in an advanced model of hindlimb ischemia in rabbits with diabetes and hyperlipidemia. Our studies demonstrate enhancement in vascularity and new blood vessel growth with treatment with syndecan-4 proteoliposomes in combination with FGF-2 or FGF-2/PDGF-BB. The effects of the treatments were particularly effective in enhancing vascularity in the lower limb with a 2-4 increase in blood vessels in the treatment group in comparison to the control group. In addition, we demonstrate that the syndecan-4 proteoliposomes have stability for at least 28 days when stored at 4°C to allow transport and use in the hospital environment. In addition, we performed toxicity studies in the mice and found no toxic effects even when injected at high concentration. Overall, our studies support that syndecan-4 proteoliposomes markedly enhance the therapeutic potential of growth factors in the context of disease and may be promising therapeutics for inducing vascular regeneration in peripheral ischemia. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Peripheral ischemia is a common condition in which there is a lack of blood flow to the lower limbs. This condition can lead to pain while walking and, in severe cases, critical limb ischemia and limb loss. In this study, we demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a novel injectable therapy for enhancing revascularization in peripheral ischemia using an advanced large animal model of peripheral vascular disease using rabbits with hyperlipidemia and diabetes.

Biomechanical regulation of breast cancer metastasis and progression.

Physical activity has been consistently linked to decreased incidence of breast cancer and a substantial increase in the length of survival of patients with breast cancer. However, the understanding of how applied physical forces directly regulate breast cancer remains limited. We investigated the role of mechanical forces in altering the chemoresistance, proliferation and metastasis of breast cancer cells. We found that applied mechanical tension can dramatically alter gene expression in breast cancer cells, leading to decreased proliferation, increased resistance to chemotherapeutic treatment and enhanced adhesion to inflamed endothelial cells and collagen I under fluidic shear stress. A mechanistic analysis of the pathways involved in these effects supported a complex signaling network that included Abl1, Lck, Jak2 and PI3K to regulate pro-survival signaling and enhancement of adhesion under flow. Studies using mouse xenograft models demonstrated reduced proliferation of breast cancer cells with orthotopic implantation and increased metastasis to the skull when the cancer cells were treated with mechanical load. Using high throughput mechanobiological screens we identified pathways that could be targeted to reduce the effects of load on metastasis and found that the effects of mechanical load on bone colonization could be reduced through treatment with a PI3Kγ inhibitor.

Lack of association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers and pain improvement in patients with oral cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of literature implicating angiotensin II in the modulation of tumour-associated inflammation and pain. However, the impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on pain and inflammation has not yet been studied in oral cancers. The objective is to investigate the role of ACEi and ARB pharmacotherapy on preoperative pain and inflammatory biomarkers, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), in patients with oral cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on patients who underwent oral cancer surgery. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Kruskal-Wallis analysis was used to evaluate differences in demographic, tumour-related and preoperative characteristics and amongst patients using ARBs, ACEis and no treatment. Multivariable analysis was fitted to estimate the effects of important covariates on severe preoperative pain. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients with oral malignancies were included in the study. After adjusting for significant covariates, patients with perineural invasion were found to have higher levels of pain (p = 0.0278). Similarly, patients taking ARBs were found to have lower levels of perineural invasion (p = 0.035). The analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in pain levels when comparing ARBs or ACEis to the no treatment group (p = 0.250). Furthermore, the use of ARB or ACEi did not significantly alter preoperative NLR (p = 0.701) or MLR (p = 0.869). CONCLUSIONS: When compared to no treatment, ARBs and ACEis are not associated with significant analgesic effect or decreased inflammatory scores (NLR, PLR and MLR).